![]() Don't know if it showing this AND XV being able to read the card is related to some Canon software installed (but doesn't work for the camera itself). When I plug in the memory card, what shows in regular Explorer, as a removable drive (assigned a letter), is "Canon DC."Īt the same time, I can't find any Canon programs running. Then, XV (& even IrfanView) can read it (as SD/MMC). That said, I decided to plug my camera's SD memory card directly into my computer's slot for it. Perhaps the Vista update you mentioned would be the difference? I'll probably try it & let everyone know. Anything's "possible," but mine wasn't a cheap, bottom of the heap unit. most decent, full functioned Canon cameras. don't work, they take more time than what I'm doing now.1st, I doubt there's a difference in compatibility of various software detecting my camera vs. This could happen before the process described above, or after. What I'd like to do is figure out a way to pull these all together quickly to decide which are the one or two best of the best. Ok, now the folder culled, and you have a half dozen keepers of each car, but they're still spread out in a folder with hundreds of other shots.Then later in the folder you find more bursts of the same car, go through the same process, and end up with more.Then later in the folder you find the same car, cull another burst, and end up with another 1 or 2.So maybe you cull 8 shots out of a burst and end up with 1.Car goes by you 100 times, the bursts are spread all through the folder. My workflow is similar to yours, the problem I'm trying to solve is how to 'quickly' get all of the shots of the same vehicle in the same spot at the same time. How do you tackle it?Ĭlick to expand.I thought maybe you and might chime in. I can't be the only one who has to sort through this number of shots, some of you have to be doing it efficiently. That would save me processing time but increase culling time to the extent it may not help. The only thing I have come up with so far is to create a folder for each subject, then dig through the shots and move each to it's respective folder. In other words, all 20+/- frames together before culling. I would like to figure out a quick method to get all of the shots of each subject in a single place, then look through them and decide which one is the keeper. I use Darktable, so not a lot of file management. What I need to do is figure out a way to sort and cull these quickly. In some cases maybe two are worth it, and in a very rare case three. The thing is I do not need 4-6 shots of the same subject, I only need the best one. Many of the single shots could again be the same subject. Add the 100 single frame shots and I have 182 photos to process. Call it an average of 4 redundancies per subject, so:ģ30/4 = 82 separate subjects, each with 4 keeper shots. Of the 330 keepers many are redundant as described above. So:ġ750 frames/avg - 100 = 1650 burst frames, /5 on average = 330 keepers. Just for illustration, we'll say the single shots are 100 or so and the rest are bursts. I do this for each separate single shot or burst. Second, normal workflow, or what I've been doing: I start by going through each burst and determining which of the frames is the one I want to process, then I delete the rest. Most times the subject is redundant, that is to say I have need to shoot the same subject several times, some as few as 2, but many as much as 5 or 6. Let's say an average burst of five frames. Some of these are single shots, most are short bursts. ![]() The question is how to approach it.įirst the background: 1500-2000 photos shared by two cameras. I've been thinking lately about the amount of time spent on processing and have decided it REALLY needs to be cut down.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |